Derbystats Homepage
 
 Contact Me
 
 Signup now
 
 Membership page
 

 2007 Derbystats $10.00

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           Derbystats Definitions

 

Dosage index

The dosage index (DI) is derived from the profile to reflect the ratio of speed-to-stamina in a pedigree. This is calculated by adding points from the two "speed" categories (brilliant and intermediate) plus half of those from the classic (middle) category, and dividing that total by the points from the two stamina categories (solid and professional), plus the other half of the classic points. The higher the DI, the more speed is supposedly present in the pedigree. Average North American DI is 2.40-thus, Cigar's DI of 2.33 indicates he has slightly more stamina in his pedigree than average. A 4.00 DI is generally the cutoff, over which a horse is considered not likely to get the American classic distance of 1-1/4 miles.

     Other Dosage website:   Thoroughbred Times

                                          Dosage: A Practical Approach

                                          Chefs de Race

                                          List of Chefs de Race

   

Center of Distribution

Center of distribution (CD) is a more complicated calculation derived from the profile. Theoretically, as with DI, the higher the CD, the lower a horse's distance potential. Average CD in this country is +.70. Apple Tree (Fr)-winner of three 1-1/2-mile Grade/Group 1 events in three countries in 1993-'94-has a CD of -.20. Man o' War apparently could have run all day and into the night with a -1.17 CD. Conversely, Secretariat's CD of +.90 was above average-yet he was arguably the most eminently capable runner at up to 1-1/2 miles that this country has seen in years.

As with almost any man-made, theoretical tool, caution must be taken. The late author/breeder Abram Hewitt, who embraced dosage, issued a warning years ago when he wrote: "By definition, dosage studies are restricted to 'chefs-de-race,' and all other mares and sires are excluded from consideration. Some of these exclusions may play an important part in the inheritance of an animal ... and excluding them could prove in some cases misleading. To this extent, handling dosage becomes as much an art as it does a science."

 

Genetic Strength Value

GSV (Genetic Strength Value) reflects the overall strength of a pedigree by looking at the 31 stallions that appear in the first five generations of the pedigree. The higher the GSV, the better ancestors the prospective foal has. The GSV for a given foal can change since young, unproven sires and broodmare sires may get better ratings as they prove to produce runners or worse if they have excellent pedigrees but prove flops as sires.

 

Beyer Speed Rating

Beyer Speed Figures are available exclusively in Daily Racing Form. Every performance by every horse in North America is assigned a number which reflects the time of the race and the inherent speed of the track over which it was run, and permits easy comparison of efforts at different distances. A figure of 95 denotes exactly the same quality of performance whether it was earned at Santa Anita or Suffolk Downs. Note: Beyer Speed figures are not available for races outside of North America; instead horses outside North America carry Timeform ratings, a highly respected provider of performance ratings for European racing. Timeform ratings are on a different scale than Beyer ratings-in fact, they are ratings compiled by experienced writers-- and should be utilized with this in mind.

 

Power Rating

A number that measures the quality of each horse's most recent starts by combining dozens of handicapping factors into one easy-to-use rating.  Speed, class, pace, form, weight, distance and many more factores are combined by a sophisticated algorithm to form this rating.  This ranking was developed and is determined by experts at www.brisnet.com.

 

Experimental Free Handicap

A year-end projection of the best North American two-year-olds of the season, put together by a panel, under the auspices of The Jockey Club, that is based on performance in unrestricted races.  Two lists are drawn up, one for mailes and one for females.

 

Pedigree Distance Rating

This rating measures the quality and suitability of the horse's breeding for races run at today's distance. This ranking was developed and is determined by experts at www.brisnet.com.

 

Dual-qualifiers in the Kentucky Derby

In 1984, Leon Rasmussen, the Daily Racing Form’s Bloodlines columnist at the time, devised a simple but generally accurate formula for the time for handicapping the Kentucky Derby (G1): The Derby winner had to be a top two-year-old and have a stamina-laden pedigree to win the race. Specifically, his dual dosage theory required a horse to be weighted within the top ten pounds of the Experimental Free Handicap highweight and have a dosage index of 4.00 or lower. Or, the horse had to be a champion in his native country and have the proper dosage. This latter requirement neatly accounted for the 1983 Derby triumph of Sunny’s Halo, who was weighted at 108 pounds on the Experimental but was champion juvenile male in Canada.

From 1972 through 1990, every winner of the Derby was a dual qualifier. In 1991, however, that skein was broken by Strike the Gold, who was not weighted on the Experimental Free Handicap and had a dosage greater than 4.00 (his dosage was later recast, however, after Alydar was quickly named a classic chef-de-race, to make him dosage compliant).

With Strike the Gold now compliant, according to Rasmussen, no Derby winner since 1929 had a dosage index above 4.00 or a center of distribution above 1.25.

The dual dosage theory held up through most of the 1990s. The last seven runnings of the Derby, however, shattered the concept.

The 1998 Derby was won by Real Quiet, who was a non-qualifier, with a dosage index (DI) of 5.29 and an Experimental weight of 117 pounds, 11 pounds less than 1997 Horse of the Year and Experimental highweight Favorite Trick.

The next year, reformed claimer Charismatic won the Kentucky Derby without an Experimental weight and possessing a DI of 5.22.

In 2000, Fusaichi Pegasus won the Derby without an Experimental weight because he raced just once at two, and his DI of 3.67 was just under the 4.00 requirement.

In 2001, Monarchos brought a DI of 1.40 into the Derby, did not have an Experimental weight because he had made just two starts at two.

In 2002, War Emblem won the Derby without being weighted on the Experimental, having been off the board in his only stakes attempt at two, though he did have a DI of 3.40.

In 2003, Funny Cide, carried a DI of 1.53 but was not weighted on the Experimental because he did not meet the qualifications. The gelding was unbeaten in three races as a two-year-old, but two of his victories came in restricted state-bred stakes—thus not eligible for consideration to be weighted on the Experimental.

In 2004, Smarty Jones, like Funny Cide, qualified on dosage, with a DI of 3.40, and he was similarly undefeated as a two-year-old. But with victories only in a maiden special weight event and a state-bred restricted stakes, he also was not weighted on the Experimental.

Qualifiers in 2005

Horse Weight Dosage Index (DI)
Declan’s Moon 126 3.50
Sweet Catomine (filly) 124 2.00
Afleet Alex 124 2.11
Sun King 123 3.00
Rockport Harbor 122 1.67
Consolidator 120 3.57
Galloping Grocer 119 4.00
Southern Africa 118 3.00
Park Avenue Ball 116 2.56

Top 10 Derby rules

Starting in 1992, every Derby winner has met at least eight of our 10 criteria, and only '96 winner Grindstone and '98 Real Quite failed to meet nine or 10 of 10.

1. Prefer horses whose pedigree, measured by the controversial but effective "dosage index," shows the stamina to win a 1 1/4-mile race.

2. Prefer horses who were counted among the leaders of their age group for the previous season -- rated within 10 pounds of the leader in the Experimental Free Handicap of 2-year-old colts and geldings.

3. Prefer horses who won races of one mile or more as 2-year-olds.

4. Throw out horses who didn't win any race at age 2. No such late bloomer has won the Derby since Proud Clarion in '67.

5. Prefer horses who had three or four races -- no more, no less -- between Jan. 1 and the Derby. Every winner since '84 had three or four.

6. Toss out any horse who didn't prep in a 1 1/8-mile race.

7. Prefer horses who finished third or better in their final preps, like 38 of the past 40 Derby winner.

8. Don't be too impressed by horses who won their final preps. The past six Derby winners saved their best for the first Saturday in May.

9. Prefer horses ridden by jockeys of national renown.

10. Don't bet on the post-time favorite.

This is from a 1998 article in the Lexignton Herald-Leader. It seems to hold true every year.


Any other questions or clarifications can be sent to webmaster@derbystats.com

 

 

 

 

  hosted by http://www.intelnetics.com